On 1/20/19 4:20 PM, enh wrote: > or that just isn't started yet (like hexdump), patch is probably in > the worst state: that will need fuzz support (which POSIX describes in > more detail than i would have expected: > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/patch.html)
This page does not contain the word "fuzz"? What were you referring to? The following options were dropped from historical implementations of patch as insufficiently useful to standardize: -F The -F option specified the number of lines of a context diff to ignore when searching for a place to install a patch. It doesn't implement .orig and .rej files either. And is one of the few users of get_line() instead of getline(), and should probably be converted... *shrug* All fixable, just... what do you need? Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net