On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 9:31 AM Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6/27/19 1:10 PM, enh wrote: > > this also fixed the echo test failure. now at 68 passed, 11 failed > > (though that includes the split test failure that's really just "mksh > > doesn't support that bash extension"). > > I'm actively working on a shell that _should_ support the bash extension > (which > is why I used it in the tests), but that's got another month to go before it's > usable and you're not using it this year even if it's perfect, so...
yeah, sorry about that. i did wonder about adding a "# TODO: remove when toysh is done". this actually reminds me of the issues i have running tests on macOS: the problem there is that the /bin tools are so anemic that many of the tests fail just because of them. i don't currently have a better idea than having a "known good" toybox and symlinks, and having that directory on my path (so the command being tested is coming from the new toybox, but i can still use toybox rather than the host for the commands used while testing --- stat being the most obvious example). i've not been thinking very hard about it though because macOS -- like "switching to toysh" -- is a problem for another year... > Sigh. Applied. > > Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
