On 2/14/21 6:17 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > On 2/13/21 5:45 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > Part of what's confusing me here is you're still skipping device 0:0, which > is a > "should never happen" entry? (Even ramfs is only major 0 with minor > incrementing > per-mount I think?) > > Can we just change to print the - - - - entries for a device 0 0 and not have > to > change the lib plumbing for the extra flag? Or am I missing something?
Tell me if commit 5f5f97f215bb implements what you want? Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
