On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 3:32 PM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote:
> On 2/12/21 7:37 PM, enh via Toybox wrote: > > In xgetmountlist(), keep track of whether we could stat or not, so we > > can distinguish an actual device 0:0 from a failed stat/statvfs. > > Is there an actual device 0:0? > (i was just preserving the existing 0:0 behavior. i didn't understand the comment. IANA i'd heard of, but...) > > Also switch to FLAG() and capitalize POSIX. > > I'm tempted to break that part out and apply it just so I can see what the > rest > of the changes are more clearly. > > You want to print unstat-able devices with "-" as all of their > human_readable() > return values? And in-band signaling is not reliable because you have > devices > returning 0 as their major:minor? (This df.c isn't the only thing that's > going > to fail on that...) > i was just trying to match coreutils' df behavior (as a prelude to looking at the overmount issues). > Rob > _______________________________________________ > Toybox mailing list > Toybox@lists.landley.net > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net >
_______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
