On 10/16/23 19:28, Oliver Webb wrote: >> That said, a -l long output version that has the raw number, and the human >> readable, and time, and recent/total rate, might be useful? (I'd prefer -l >> instead of -v, but same general concept.) > > I added a -l[ong] option in the below patch, It only shows the average rate, > not recent
I was 2/3 through adding -l myself when I saw this. Credited you with the idea in the checkin comment. > While trying to do math with the time, > I noticed that 'then' was never set to anything after initialization to 0, > and 'now' is only used while setting it to millitime(). Indeed, that's part of the reason I started fiddling with it... > Which means the check for "Have we already done this in the last 250ms?" > might as well be > "if(millitime()<250) continue;". I fixed this by setting 'then' at the end of > the for loop Let me know if I screwed stuff up this time, I've been under the weather the past few days... Thanks, Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
