ping?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 8:48 AM enh <e...@google.com> wrote: > > ping? > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 7:52 PM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote: > > > > On 7/26/24 07:13, enh via Toybox wrote: > > >> Don't know Rob cares about this, but ?: is not ISO C. It's a GNU > > >> extension. > > > > Specifically https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.1.0/gcc/Conditionals.html > > > > > with 80 existing uses of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvis_operator > > > in toybox, i'm pretty sure rob knows this already :-) > > > > Yeah, and it's been discussed multiple times over the years, starting with > > http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2012-April/013359.html > > where we were already looking into the portability of it. > > > > I should try to dig something up to put in code.html but the decision way > > back > > when was "if the 2.6 kernel needed it to build, toybox is probably ok > > relying on > > it being there" because we exist in an ecosystem. (The fact I maintained a > > tinycc fork for 3 years trying to extend it to make tccboot work with > > current > > vanilla source may have influenced this. :) > > > > I _thought_ this was recorded somewhere in code.html or design.html but > > it's not > > the easiest thing to grep for. There's several links at > > https://landley.net/toybox/cleanup.html#advice but this isn't one of them... > > > > There's a couple others things like this, "int x=x;" to shut up the stupid > > gcc > > "is never used uninitialized" warnings comes to mind (although that's > > migrated > > to a QUIET macro that does conditional zero initialization)... > > > > Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
