Stefan Berger/Watson/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 02/11/2016 10:24:18 AM:
> > If you'd create a patch that would migrate the subsystem to that and
> > do also do this split, I could take that patch as an independent
> > contribution and you would have a better baseline to develop on top
> > of. What do you think?
>
> We need two steps here. One to let tpmm_chip_alloc call two
> functions tpm_chip_alloc + tpmm_chip_dev (better name?), which are
> both going to be public and called by tpm-vtpm.c, and provide
> tpm_chip_free. Let me do that. Then we can get rid of the bitmap for
> the chip->dev_num independently and use idr there.
>
Updated my branch now and based the driver on this function.
https://github.com/stefanberger/linux/commits/vtpm-driver.v3
No current driver needs this additional patch I think. So it can wait. I
fixed a locking problem on the way, though...
Stefan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
