On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 03:04:01PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:33:26AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:03:39PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:58:49PM +0300, andrew zamansky wrote:
> > > > if irq==0 (actualy invalid value) then error is printed to dmesg after
> > > > trying to register to 0 interrupt 
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c | 4 +++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c 
> > > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c
> > > > index 75a80e466..3081529 100644
> > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c
> > > > @@ -554,7 +554,9 @@ static int i2c_nuvoton_probe(struct i2c_client 
> > > > *client,
> > > >          *   TPM_INTF_INT_LEVEL_LOW | TPM_INTF_DATA_AVAIL_INT
> > > >          * The IRQ should be set in the i2c_board_info (which is done
> > > >          * automatically in of_i2c_register_devices, for device tree 
> > > > users */
> > > > -       chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
> > > > +       if(chip->flags)
> > > > +               chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
> > > > +
> > > >         priv->irq = client->irq;
> > > >  
> > > >         if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ) {
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > PS. There's a style error. "if()" should be "if ()". I don't mind fixing
> > > that. Just remember that next time.
> > 
> > Andrew/Jarkko:
> > 
> > Uhm, this looks wrong to me.. The original code was like this:
> > 
> > -       chip->vendor.irq = client->irq;
> > -       if (chip->vendor.irq) {
> > 
> > And was wrongly changed to this:
> > 
> > +       chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
> > +       priv->irq = client->irq;
> > +       if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ) {
> > 
> > Jarkko, can you fold this into the patch to fix it please:
> 
> Right. Sure. It's not merged to my next nor it has been part of any pull
> request so this is still doable.

Done.

/Jarkko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

Reply via email to