On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:27:40PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:34:53PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > Refactored eventlog.c file into tpm_eventlog.c and tpm_eventlog_init.c
> >
> > Breakdown is:
> >
> > * tpm_eventlog_init.c : Moved eventlog initialization methods like
> > to setup securityfs, to open and release seqfile from tpm_eventlog.c
> > to this file. This is to keep the logic of initialization for TPM1.2
> > and TPM2.0 in common file.
> >
> > * tpm_eventlog.c : This file now has only methods specific to parsing
> > and iterate TPM1.2 entry log formats. It can understand only TPM1.2
> > and is called by methods in tpm_eventlog_init if identified TPM device
> > is TPM1.2.
> >
> > Changelog v2:
> >
> > * Using of_node property of device rather than direct reading
> > the device node.
> > * Cleaned up the code to have generic open() for ascii and bios
> > measurements
> > * Removed dyncamic allocation for bios_dir and having dentry array
> > directly into tpm-chip.
> > * Using dev_dbg instead of pr_err in tpm_of.c
> > * readlog(...) now accepts struct tpm_chip * as parameter.
>
> This patch needs to be split.
>
> One patch per idea please.
And changelog per patch *set*.
/Jarkko
> > ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > - tpm-y += tpm_eventlog.o tpm_acpi.o
> > + tpm-y += tpm_eventlog_init.o tpm_eventlog.o tpm_acpi.o
> > else
> > ifdef CONFIG_TCG_IBMVTPM
> > - tpm-y += tpm_eventlog.o tpm_of.o
> > + tpm-y += tpm_eventlog_init.o tpm_eventlog.o tpm_of.o
> > endif
>
> Still need to fix this, more like
>
> tpm_of should be included if CONFIG_OF is set,
> and tpm_acpi if CONFIG_ACPI is set, do not do this based on random
> other configus..
>
>
> > endif
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_CORE) += tpm_tis_core.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > index e595013..7f6cdab 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > @@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *dev,
> > chip->dev.release = tpm_dev_release;
> > chip->dev.parent = dev;
> > chip->dev.groups = chip->groups;
> > + if (dev->of_node)
> > + chip->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
>
> No. chip->dev.parent->of_node.
>
> > -extern struct dentry **tpm_bios_log_setup(const char *);
> > -extern void tpm_bios_log_teardown(struct dentry **);
> > +extern void tpm_bios_log_setup(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > +extern void tpm_bios_log_teardown(struct tpm_chip *chip);
>
> We are trying to get rid of these extra externs..
>
> > +
> > + bin_file =
> > + securityfs_create_file("binary_bios_measurements",
>
> No, do
>
> chip->bios_dir_count = 0;
> chip->bios_dir[chip->bios_dir_count] = [..]
> if (is_bad(chip->bios_dir[chip->bios_dir_count])
> goto err
> chip->bios_dir_count++
>
> err:
> for (I = 0; I != chip->bios_dir_count; ++I)
> securityfs_remove(chip->bios_dir[I]);
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > + if (chip->bios_dir[i])
> > + securityfs_remove(chip->bios_dir[i]);
>
> Same logic as err: example above
> >
> > - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "vtpm");
> > + if (chip->dev.of_node)
> > + np = chip->dev.of_node;
> > if (!np) {
> > - pr_err("%s: ERROR - IBMVTPM not supported\n", __func__);
> > + dev_dbg(&chip->dev, "%s: ERROR - IBMVTPM not supported\n",
> > + __func__);
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
>
> Where you able to test this on IBM's 'vtpm' stuff as well?
>
> >
> > sizep = of_get_property(np, "linux,sml-size", NULL);
> > if (sizep == NULL) {
> > - pr_err("%s: ERROR - SML size not found\n", __func__);
> > + dev_dbg(&chip->dev, "%s: ERROR - SML size not found\n",
> > + __func__);
> > goto cleanup_eio;
> > }
> > if (*sizep == 0) {
> > - pr_err("%s: ERROR - event log area empty\n", __func__);
> > + dev_dbg(&chip->dev, "%s: ERROR - event log area empty\n",
> > + __func__);
> > goto cleanup_eio;
> > }
> >
> > basep = of_get_property(np, "linux,sml-base", NULL);
> > if (basep == NULL) {
> > - pr_err("%s: ERROR - SML not found\n", __func__);
> > + dev_dbg(&chip->dev, "%s: ERROR - SML not found\n",
> > + __func__);
> > goto cleanup_eio;
> > }
> >
> > log->bios_event_log = kmalloc(*sizep, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!log->bios_event_log) {
> > - pr_err("%s: ERROR - Not enough memory for BIOS measurements\n",
> > - __func__);
> > of_node_put(np);
>
> Why is there an of_node_put here but not in other error paths? Where is
> the get this is putting?
>
> Jason
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
> planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> tpmdd-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
