On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:59:00PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:09:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > 1. Does TCG have a standard for this I2C binding in a DT like they have > > for ACPI? > > 2. Can I expect that the binding has the same fields with the same names > > in some other platform that POWER? For example, what if there was an > > ARM based platform. Would the same binding work there? > > > > I'm looking for document or something where you got your information. > > Right now your code is based on nothing from my point of view. > > There is no real standards body for device tree right now. > > Submitting a Docuemtation patch to the device tree maintainers is the > best we have today, and we as the TPM community should review it to > ensure it makes sense from our perspective. > > Other DT platforms like ARM will use the bindings defined in > Documentation/DeviceTree.
So how do I know that this the right way to specify the attibutes for a TPM device and all vendors would like to have the attributes like this? > Jason /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
