On 1/3/2017 4:47 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > I think we should also consider TPM 1.2 support in all of this, it is > still a very popular piece of hardware and it is equally able to > support a RM.
I suspect that TPM 2.0 and TPM 1.2 are so different that there may be little or no code in common. My immediate need is for a 2.0 resource manager, since it's a gap in the technology, while 1.2 does have tcsd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
