On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:09:33PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > Hmm, I dug in history of tpm-interface.c and the code had actually rejected > zero timeouts until commit 8e54caf407b98e (this is the commit that > introduced the Atmel 3204 workaround) and let default timeout values remain > instead (it looks like they were exactly like these in above override at > that time).
The model changed around then.. Just printing if the timeout is 0 is enough for now.. > Did Atmel 3204 report wrong but non-zero timeouts? Yes, I think it may have.. Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
