On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 14:04 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:10:42AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > Now that sessions are isolated, we can introduce a session_buf in > > the tpm2 space to save and restore them. This allows us to have > > many more sessions active simultaneously (up to > > TPM_PT_MAX_SESSIONS). As part of this, we must intercept and > > manually remove contexts for flushed sessions. > > Again I don't understand the interception part. Like with transient > objects I just catch TPM_RC_HANDLE error and forget them in the save > part.
it's for the global session tracking patch (see other email for details) > PS. Do you mind if I take part of the patch that encapsulates a > single context save as of my patch that implements transient object > swapping? It merely moves the code in there to a different location. > Would just make the patch set cleaner. I would do this for v4 of the > patch set. Sure. Rebase should be able to do this easily for me. James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
