On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:55:43PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:53:36PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Added two new callbacks to struct tpm_class_ops: > > > > - request_locality > > - relinquish_locality > > > > These are called before sending and receiving data from the TPM. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> > > --- > > This not yet v2 of this patch. I'm checking that this is what needs to be > > done > > for tpm_tis_core before I go through testing etc. Thank you. > > And apparently I did not amend tpm-interface.c change :( Anyway, I'm > merely sanity checking that I'm doing the right thing.
If check_locality fails request_locality returns locality number but it's not used for anything. Would it be OK to change it to just return -EBUSY in this case? /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
