On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:39:09PM -0800, Sonny Rao wrote: > >> > We recently added global suspend/resume callbacks to the TPM >> > core. Those call backs do not power off the TPM, they just prepare its >> > internal state to loose power to the chip. Skipping that process on >> > hardware that does not power-off the TPM makes sense to me. >> > >> > But, Sonny, perhaps this should be a global flag in tpm_chip, not a >> > per-interface-driver override? >> >> It's a property of the board design not the chip -- maybe I'm >> misunderstanding? > > I mean do not add the code to handle this to tpm_i2c_infineon.c but in > the common chip code instead. > > tpm_i2c_infineon.c should only parse DT properties that are relavent > to the bus that delivers commands to the TPM, things that apply to how > a TPM chip operates should be handled in the core code because they > apply to any command transport bus.
Oh right, sorry -- yes this makes perfect sense. > > Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
