On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:27:16AM -0700, Josh Zimmerman wrote: > It sounds like there are several intertwined issues here. I'd like to > keep this patch relatively minimal, so here are my current thoughts on > a path forward: > > * Refactor references to chip->ops to go through tpm_try_get_ops, as > mentioned in the previous patch > * Have a common tpm_shutdown method in tpm-chip.c that device specific > drivers call (or that is just registered automatically for all > devices?) that nulls out chip->ops (to prevent any commands being > issued after tpm2_shutdown) and sends tpm2_shutdown > > This would leave further device refactoring for a future patch. > > Before I spend too much time on this, does this seem like a reasonable > approach? Anything I'm missing? > > Thanks, > Josh
I think this sounds like a plan. /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
