If you need the features from workflow, why not just use that branch? --Noah
On Sep 18, 2006, at 3:42 PM, ML Philip Instadia wrote: > > Please tell me workflow gets higher priority. From a user's stand > point that is by far the most important improvement. > > I too have techno-fascination and want the product based on the most > capable foundation. But seriously: finish the workflow and trac is > THE killer-app. > > Sincerely, > Philip Bergen > > On Sep 16, 2006, at 4:13 AM, Matt Good wrote: > >> >> Ilias Lazaridis wrote: >>> I've notices that the milestone 0.11 contains many tasks: >>> >>> http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.11 >>> >>> Wouldn't it be preferable to split this work into a few more >>> milestones? >>> >>> This could be of benefit (in order to avoid similar delays as with >>> the >>> actual 0.10 version). >>> >>> 0.11 - Focusing on Genshi Migration >>> >>> 0.12 - Focusing on SQLAlchemy >>> >>> 0.13 - Focusing on Workflow and Permission >>> >>> (the order could change of course, I've have quickly guessed the >>> dependencies) >> >> Those are the current goals, though since the major features are >> developed in the sandbox before merging into the trunk we can delay >> some features if we decide they're not ready for 0.11. We'll have to >> wait until 0.11 is coming along to see how we feel about the >> scheduling. >> >> -- Matt Good >> >> >>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
