On 5/24/07, Christian Boos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't tested the branch yet, but looking at the changes, it seems good. > What I'd like to try out before the WE would be to bring the > /sandbox/security up to date with trunk and your newer > /sandbox/pycon/security branch, using your approach.
I don't understand what the purpose of this would be. The branches have diverged sufficiently that merging them would gain no benefit and much pain. > As usual, I want to check whether the approach is good enough for > handling fine grained ticket permissions and attachment permissions. The system is functionally equivalent, it's just the method of accessing the policy that has changed. The context object is still passed to the policy, with all the information that provides (attachment parent resource, etc.). In that respect, nothing differs from the old branch. I'll convert the attachment module tonight, and I'd prefer to do any other changes myself. -- Evolution: Taking care of those too stupid to take care of themselves. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
