[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > we run 0.11dev-r6737 ... but also on teo takes 4 times longer for > displaying a query link than for displaying other wiki links. is this > ok according to your experience given the string processing done? > >> >>> example: >>> 5 links like [query:status=new|assigned| >>> reopened&keywords=~bla&type=task&order=priority 01] take one second >>> (i.e. 50 take 10 sec) >>>
OK, links like [query:status=...] will require /some/ processing power, (query = Query.from_string(), then query.get_href()), whereas the other form of query links, i.e. [query:?status=...] will not, as it's already an part of an URL than only needs to be copied around (1). You may try the later form, and see if that makes a difference. If not, then it's something else, in the wiki lhref processing. -- Christian (1) - see http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracQuery#UsingTracLinks for the exact difference between the two styles --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
