> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Nicholas Bergson-Shilcock
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Trac-dev] Re: Registration confirmation for AccountManager
> 
> 
> Thanks, I hadn't seen #874. The interface described there is similar
> to what I proposed, though I think it might be better in a few
> respects. E.g., the code from #874 includes two separate interfaces
> (IRegistrationFieldProvider and IRegistrationManipulator), which makes
> things a bit more general than what I did. I posted a link to my patch
> along with a note about the interface differences on the ticket.
> 
> Also, I noticed in the original patch submitted by coderanger in #874
> that there is code to support adding both optional and required
> fields. This seems likes A Good Idea to me. Ideally, it would handle
> cases where two plugins add fields of the same name, where one of them
> is optional and the other is required. In this case the required field
> would subsume the optional one.
> 
> Do you know what the present state of #874 is? Are there plans to roll
> the patch into AccountManager?

Given that stream filters are now available, I would rather see people use
those to alter the UI before adding such single-case extension points. You
can use a request filter to handle the verification step.

--Noah


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to