Noah Kantrowitz kirjoitti: >> Jani Tiainen wrote: >>> Last autum (around middle of November) there was short discussion about >>> information quality in tickets, and generally some other things about >>> documentation of Trac. And now I'm specially referring to end user >>> documentation. This area could do some improvement, something like "Trac >>> documentation team", which only takes care of that documentation is up >>> to date and collects relevant information from all that information >>> noise that is in tickets, here on mailing list etc. This is just an >>> idea. >> I'm not yet that familiar with Odd's newhelp branch but I hope we're >> able to include this or some similar solution into 0.12. Forming a >> Documentation team also sounds like a great idea if there is enough >> interest. > > I would loooove if we could at least get one person to agree to maintain > each of the per-platform guides (someone that actually knows how to > install Trac, since this seems to not be the case with many guide > writers). Having official solutions for common platforms (perhaps > standardize them all to Apache+FCGI as that is probably the most n00b > friendly option) would help a lot of people.
This sounded very good: 'Having official solutions' and 'standardize them all to <insert favourite combination here>'. Hmm, this just reminds me to upgrade Trac egg cookbook to match 0.11... :D -- Jani Tiainen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
