Remy Blank wrote: > mathieu wrote: > >> The CacheInvalidation issue being tackled here is solely related to >> the current database-backed implementation of the caching API. >> > > Just one clarification: the cache we are talking about cannot be defined > as database-backed. The database is the primary data storage, and we > cache some of that data in memory. At this point, we are not talking > about caching e.g. generated HTML pages or anything like that (yet). >
Also, that "other" cache level has already been discussed a bit in http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/7739 (trac & memcached). Please have a look there for the problems involved and some further ideas. -- Christian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
