On May 21, 10:14 pm, Remy Blank <[email protected]> wrote: > So I'd suggest continuing to use svnmerge.py as usual, with the revert > on Makefile.cfg.sample. > Thanks Remy, I do wonder if "svn propdel svn:mergeinfo Makefile.cfg.sample" would do us good... See any problems with that? :::simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [Trac-dev] Trac repos - 'svnmerge.py' vs 'svn merge' (1.5) osimons
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - 'svnmerge.py' vs 'svn merg... Remy Blank
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - 'svnmerge.py' vs 'svn ... osimons
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - 'svnmerge.py' vs '... Remy Blank
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - 'svnmerge.py' vs '... Greg Troxel
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - 'svnmerge.py' ... osimons
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - 'svnmerge... Remy Blank
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - 'svnm... Christian Boos
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - '... Emmanuel Blot
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - '... Christian Boos
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - '... Emmanuel Blot
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - '... Christian Boos
- [Trac-dev] Re: Trac repos - '... Emmanuel Blot
