Christian Boos <[email protected]> writes: > On 3/22/2010 2:45 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >> Quoting "Christian Boos" <[email protected]>: >>> We're getting quite close to being able to release a beta of >>> 0.12. While there are still a few important tickets to be finished >>> first (#9060 for example), we're really getting there. >> >> AFAIK, 0.12 needs Genshi > 0.5.1[1], but 0.6 is not yet released[2]. >> For Debian (and other distribution as well, I assume) it would be >> nice to have a Genshi release before Trac RCs. > > Yes, it would be nice. > >> Are there any plans to synchronise Genshi 0.6 and Trac 0.12 >> releases? Thanks in advance! > > There's no plan, only hope ;-) > > More seriously, I'm not really at ease with the fact that either > Genshi and Babel are more or less on life support, since Christopher > has switched to other interests. Pedro Algarvio seems our best chance > here ;-) Pedro? > > Related: > - http://genshi.edgewall.org/ticket/369 > - http://babel.edgewall.org/ticket/212
Speaking as someone using trac seriously, it seems scary to be talking about a 0.12 release that depends on unreleased versions of other tools. If that's really the case, then I'd say the other tools need to be encouraged/helped to get to release or forked and released before 0.12 has an rc. When you think about putting trac into a packaging system, depending on unreleased code means creating a new -beta package for that code from svn/git/whatever, or updating the allegedly stable package to an unreleased version.
pgpvYIP4K9717.pgp
Description: PGP signature
