-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gavin MacLean wrote: > Hi Steffen > > You're right; we don't say that we use trac on our website (to be honest > it wouldn't really be relevant to the site's intended audience). > However, I can confirm that we still use trac (version 0.11.4) for > internal projects; specifically we used it while developing our Smoovie > application. We've not really been using it for the last 5 months or so > as we've been working on a fairly major project for a client who have > asked that we use their system. However, we will certainly return to it > when we next do any in-house development and we're happy to keep > endorsing it and we have recommended it to other developers. > > As far as additional modules go we're really just sticking with the > basics. At some stage we would like to investigate a little more to see > what else we can do - too many things to do and not enough time :) > > Hope this helps
It did indeed, thank you very much for taking your time to report back. So you'll go into the revised reference list. BTW: You may want to take a look at 0.12, i.e. for i18n and multiple repository support per Trac environment. Good luck. Yours Steffen Hoffmann -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk0k3vAACgkQ31DJeiZFuHf5qgCeITFAIsAzXzxsYY9cBP8skN4b YGAAmwdy1Z2nKSwUkk6mM4maXfKPamWc =hFe4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
