On Jan 18, 2:11 am, Christian Boos <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/17/2012 4:26 PM, osimons wrote: > ... > > Right, so my proposed solution is a kind of combined 4-5 approach. > You can see a "proof of concept" attached to the ticket I created > for tracking this issue: > > http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/ticket/10530/10530-rework-report-... > > The pagination is now done using a single query, and it seems > to work well with the current reports and I hope with most > existing ones. We can probably make it more even more robust.
Moving the issue and discussion there then. > The problem with the "Mine ticket" report is still there, but > starting from that patch it should be possible to try 4.b) or > my __groupdesc__ suggestion. Now, on the subject of re-sorting... Compare: http://trac.edgewall.org/demo-0.12/report/7 with http://trac.edgewall.org/demo-0.13/report/7 Our 0.12 demo allows re-sorting columns. The 0.13 demo has no such feature. What's changed? :::simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
