Hi All, Sorry about that last post, did not mean to sent that out.
Question, does anyone have TRAC working on RHEL4 X86_64? If so, what packages do you have installed. I'm in an endless loop of required packages that are needed and not available for RHEL 4 64 bit. I can't just make sweeping changes to this production server and hope it all still works correctly. The system is patched by a corporate Redhat up2date server and if I get to many packages out of sync with that it will just cause issues later on. Is there an alternative to TRAC that would install on RHEL X86_64? Thanks, Joe ==================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] unzip]# rpm -Uvh trac-0.10.3-18.el4.at.noarch.rpm warning: trac-0.10.3-18.el4.at.noarch.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b error: Failed dependencies: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages is needed by trac-0.10.3-18.el4.at.noarch python(abi) = 2.3 is needed by trac-0.10.3-18.el4.at.noarch =================================================== The /usr/lib64 is a directory not a symlink: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unzip]# ls -ld /usr/lib64/ drwxr-xr-x 99 root root 77824 Feb 15 04:02 /usr/lib64/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] unzip]# ls -ld /usr/lib64/python2.3/ drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 20480 Feb 14 12:57 /usr/lib64/python2.3/ Same for : [EMAIL PROTECTED] unzip]# ls -ld /usr/lib drwxr-xr-x 85 root root 69632 Dec 5 04:07 /usr/lib [EMAIL PROTECTED] unzip]# ls -ld /usr/lib/python2.3/ drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 May 18 2006 /usr/lib/python2.3/ ======================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] unzip]# file /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), stripped [EMAIL PROTECTED] unzip]# file /usr/bin/python2.3 /usr/bin/python2.3: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped -----Original Message----- From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Good Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:11 PM To: Trac Users Subject: [Trac] Re: Help with python errors On Feb 14, 3:54 pm, "White, Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > trac-0.9.6-1.el4.rf This is quite old. I'd highly recommend upgrading to Trac 0.10.3. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] site-packages]# pwd > /usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages > > And also > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] site-packages]# pwd > /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages Is /usr/lib64 really a different directory? On my system (Ubuntu) this is just a symlink to /usr/lib: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -ld /usr/lib64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-08-09 11:37 /usr/lib64 -> lib > ClearSilver not installed (/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/neo_cgi.so: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) Since you appear to be running on a 64 bit platform it's possible Python is compiled as a 64 bit binary and you've installed a 32 bit version of neo_cgi.so, or the other way around. Check the library and your python binary like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/neo_cgi.so /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/neo_cgi.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), stripped [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /usr/bin/python2.4 /usr/bin/python2.4: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, stripped Of course since you're using python2.3 change the version # where appropriate. -- Matt Good --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
