Hi > It would be nice if the next drop of the Bitnami trac stack included not > only Python 2.7 (instead of 2.6 which it is currently) but also had an > Apache 2.4 version.
We configure Trac to work with Apache and mod_wsgi and currently there is not a mod_wsgi version for Windows for Apache 2.4. > I have a feature request for the Bitnami Trac Stack. It would be great if it > was a bit more of a"Batteries Included" version of trac with more plugins > pre-installed out of box. Most users need a bunch more plugins, including > user-management to add and create users, and their permissions, defaulting > to apache htpasswd auth backend, right out of the box. It is surprising > that user-configuration requires a Trac plugin to be added, and manually > configured, before I can even add a user to my installation. It was a lot > easier to get going than manually installing Mod_Wsgi into Apache, then > getting Trac going purely with Easy-install and setup.py, etc etc. > Yes, we are considering adding the user-management plugin. However there so many possible configuration that we will need to preconfigure it with the most used by users. But more and more users are requesting it so this is something that will add to the BitNami stack. > It might be a bit selfish of me to wish that TracMercurial and Mercurial > itself get added to the base Bitnami Trac Stack, but at least on Windows, > those are hard to get going. Regarding adding Mercurial and TracMercurial plugin in the stack, we really appreciate your feedback and requests :) our development is driven by the our users requests so we are glad of hearing your suggestions. It is already something that we would like to implement. However it is not as simple, also we may find incompatibilities if for instance if we upgrade to Python 2.7. There are not official Mercurial installer for this version of Python. Apart of that it seems that Git is getting more attraction and even it seems that it has been consider to make it the official repository for Trac 1.x. Best regards, Victoria. > Warren > > > On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:42:22 PM UTC-4, Dave Huang wrote: >> >> Does anyone have a solution for Apache 2.4.x on Windows with Python 2.7? >> It seems like everything mentioned so far is Apache 2.2, but I'd like to >> move to 2.4 for IPv6 support (while Apache has had IPv6 support for a long >> time, it's been disabled in the official Windows builds up until 2.4, for >> reasons that I didn't pay much attention to). I'm currently running Apache >> 2.2, Python 2.7, and mod_wsgi, and it's working well, and I'd like to stick >> with mod_wsgi. However, the mod_wsgi website doesn't seem to have any >> binaries compatible with Apache 2.4. I guess I could try compiling it >> myself... >> -- >> Name: Dave Huang > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Trac Users" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/trac-users/-/7arGaoPQkk4J. > > To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
