On Monday, March 17, 2014 4:51:20 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:34:12 PM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 4:15:46 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:12:17 PM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 1:11:28 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 9:29:56 AM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, March 15, 2014 5:40:29 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 15, 2014 12:48:07 PM UTC-7, hasienda wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 15.03.2014 17:55, ONeal Freeman wrote: 
>>>>>>>> > Good in theory but it did not work in my case since something 
>>>>>>>> during the 
>>>>>>>> > trac-admin upgrade command is wiping out some rather important db 
>>>>>>>> > fields. Now that's not to say that I do not have something 
>>>>>>>> > mis-configured. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is this 'something' that is worrying me. Granted that Trac 
>>>>>>>> upgrades 
>>>>>>>> are solid and reliable, million times tested process it is 
>>>>>>>> unlikely, 
>>>>>>>> that just you'll get hit by a flaw. Experiencing issues I would 
>>>>>>>> repeat 
>>>>>>>> the process with all plugins disabled/uninstalled and just upgrade 
>>>>>>>> Trac 
>>>>>>>> core, upgrade plugins later on, if required. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > This is my first dealing with Trac from this 
>>>>>>>> > prospective. Since I never got the tractickettemplateplugin to 
>>>>>>>> work I am 
>>>>>>>> > wondering if all of this is associated with the BitNami install 
>>>>>>>> of Trac. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nothing special with BitNami's stack as far as I know from using it 
>>>>>>>> two 
>>>>>>>> times on WinXP. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > Again, I am a novice but I have definitely learned a lot. Please 
>>>>>>>> don't 
>>>>>>>> > take any of this wrong, I sincerely appreciate you guys helping 
>>>>>>>> me and 
>>>>>>>> > your assistance has gotten me this far. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, you're welcome. Still i hope, that we'll finally get a clue, 
>>>>>>>> what 
>>>>>>>> is going on. Did we talk about DEBUG logs from upgrade process yet? 
>>>>>>>> Mysteries in code do not any good. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Steffen Hoffmann 
>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
>>>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) 
>>>>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> iEYEARECAAYFAlMkrnUACgkQ31DJeiZFuHdafACdGG8Kl+m8OtsnFNNV/mN2u4Mf 
>>>>>>>> 2YoAnjVbYgp3shiZQ0/J+DJzhEjorv1/ 
>>>>>>>> =6ehf 
>>>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've tested with Bitnami Trac and can't reproduce the upgrade issue. 
>>>>>>> I think the only thing left is to look at the database in which the 
>>>>>>> upgrade 
>>>>>>> doesn't seem to have gone correctly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see now that my manual import of data into the trac.db has 
>>>>>> distorted the ticket descriptions formatting. Whereas in the original 
>>>>>> trac 
>>>>>> instance I had line feeds between the different sections the data import 
>>>>>> eliminated the line feeds and now the text is end to end like in notepad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steffen told me it was a bad idea to do a manual update. I just 
>>>>>> couldn't figure out another way to retrieve my time and timechange 
>>>>>> fields.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you tried using the trac.db file that I sent back to you? The 
>>>>> database appears to have been upgraded without any issues and you could 
>>>>> just discard that instance that you manually tweaked. 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I missed the db you sent. Never got any type of notification. 
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is strange. I received a notification when receiving the file you 
>>> sent, so I assumed you'd receive the same style notification.
>>>
>>> You should be able to access it here: 
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6br6SyRs711OG1sTjNjRXFYVmM/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> Let me know if you encounter any problems.  
>>>
>>
>> Downloaded the db. The same fields are still empty...
>>
>
> How did you determine that they are "empty"? I pulled the file off Google 
> drive, dropped it into a Trac 1.0.1 instance and they certainly aren't 
> empty. The ticket created, modified and change timestamps are displaying 
> correctly. There must be something else going on here.
>
> Viewing the table in SQLite Administrator. 

>
> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-vFgrLhpR48Y/UyduN_1QEdI/AAAAAAAABLw/52WgjaOIccE/s1600/Untitled.png>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to