On 8/6/15, RjOllos <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 5:44:38 PM UTC-7, olemis wrote: [...] >> >> - What is the plan regarding repository access ? >> To get rid of svn and migrate all repos onto github ? >> > > No, I didn't suggest anything of the sort. This is just about > authentication. >
My point is , if you are still going to have HTTP auth for the repository then you'd be maintaining both auth schemes to make'em work together . Therefore users will still have to register and setup a password and so on . In the end this is all up to you . Adding github logins might be helpful for devs who use Github frequently . I rarely use it though . Indeed I interact with t.h.o in anonymous mode most of the time . > >> - What about RPC auth @trac-hacks.org ? >> > > Unsure. I don't know that anyone uses authenticated RPC. > ... well , for instance , at a given point in time I'd like a CI server to modify tickets when tests are reported as failures . > Your last login was 17 months ago, so I can't imagine you'd even notice if > we removed basic authentication. > Really ? Thanks for taking the time to do this research . That's interesting because I never do so . I always interact with t.h.o as anonymous user , so I was estimating this to be few years ago , to be honest . -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
