On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:12:19 +0300, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote: > If Roundup plugin system is reworked a bit, it is > possible to make extensions to create and monitor > upstream bugs (Debian). Maybe even exchange > messages with it.
That would be downstream, and I'm not sure why we would want to do that. I can see them wanting to track our bugs, since we are the upstream for them, but I'm not seeing the value of vice-versa. I've followed links to bugs that were initially reported downstream, and that is helpful, but having the chatter from the downstream bug reflected in our tracker would probably be more confusing than helpful, especially since downstream bugs tend to include "system" chatter about the status and disposition of the bug (just as ours do). If someone wants to go to the trouble of writing code to try it out, I wouldn't object to the trial, but it's not an area I'd recommend someone spend time on. Also, if upstream changes are required in the plugin system, it'll have to land there first, so there's not much point in discussing it here until then. --David _______________________________________________ Tracker-discuss mailing list Tracker-discuss@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
