Tim Tisdall added the comment: Here's some headers from a recent email sent to me:
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2a01:4f8:131:2480::3 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=2a01:4f8:131:2480::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2a01:4f8:131:2480::3 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected]; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=python.org As you can see, "dmarc=fail". (though, I can't seem to see a DMARC policy on any of the pertinent dns records) Another email from the tracker that was in my spam box said: "Why is this message in Spam? It's in violation of Google's recommended email sender guidelines." And linked to https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?hl=en-GB#authentication A DMARC policy should really be added and DKIM signing should also be added. Lately, major email providers have been clamping down to try to prevent spam by nearly requiring those things. ---------- nosy: +Tim.Tisdall _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker <[email protected]> <http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue562> _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tracker-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
