Laurent Aguerreche wrote: > Le lundi 30 octobre 2006 à 13:02 +0000, Jamie McCracken a écrit : >> Laurent Aguerreche wrote: >>> Le lundi 30 octobre 2006 à 02:01 +0000, Jamie McCracken a écrit : >>>> Laurent Aguerreche wrote: >>>>> Le vendredi 27 octobre 2006 à 23:01 +0200, Laurent Aguerreche a écrit : >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 à 17:46 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit : >>>>>>> On 10/26/06, Laurent Aguerreche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 à 16:30 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit : >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I got damn excited when I read Jamie's proposal for tracker to be >>>>>>>>> included in GNOME 2.18. >>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, when installing the deb (in Debian) linked on >>>>>>>>> gnome-announce-list today, it tells me that it depends on libc6 >>>>>>>>> (>=2.4-1) while Debian is surely going to release with 2.3.6, in >>>>>>>>> December. Is there a way in which you can accomodate debian users, >>>>>>>>> without them resorting to compilation? >>>>>>>> I'm currently working on these packages : >>>>>>>> - add a new package tracker-gnome-search-tool >>>>>>>> - some cleanups >>>>>>> Nice stuff. >>>>>> I send a patch that: >>>>>> - add a new tracker-gnome-search-tool package; >>>>>> - remove issues with --rpath [0]; >>>>>> - add --as-needed for ld to remove unnecessary library dependencies; >>>>>> - add linda overrides for warnings about wrong "changelog.gz" names. It >>>>>> happens because Tracker is seen as a native debian package. But it can >>>>>> be consider that debian packages and releases of Tracker are >>>>>> independents... so the overrides; >>>>>> - some cleanups (unnecessary files, backup files still there, etc.) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [0]: http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue >>>>> This patch made tracker-utils and tracker-gnome-search-tool depending >>>>> only to libtrackerclient0, not libtrackerclient0 (= 0.5.0). This new >>>>> patch fixes it (and it is also cumulative). >>>>> >>>>> >>>> thanks have applied to cvs >>>> >>>> It did not apply totally clean - can you check from a fresh check out >>>> (in a different directory) that its all there >>> There are still files that are generated during debian package building >>> and the "rules" file is missing some things. >>> So I send a patch (and I tested it in spite of building issues. Good >>> news is that "ioprio support" says "Yes" at configure. :-) ). >> thanks - will have a look >> >>> >>> Currently Tracker cannot be built: >>> * in configure.in: >>> >>> AC_CONFIG_FILES([ >>> Makefile >>> tracker.pc >>> docs/MakeFile >>> data/Makefile >>> ... >>> >>> at the end. >>> >>> but "docs" directory is missing... >> I added the docs directory last night with the man pages - you will need >> to do a fresh checkout to see it (for some reason I dont understand with >> cvs) >> >> its also visible in >> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/tracker/ > > I did a checkout and perhaps there were there because I only see an > error during debian package building. > > I found that manpages are not generated : "docs" directory is missing in > SUBDIRS in Makefile.am. > And a cosmetic thing: Makefile.am is named MakeFile.am in docs directory > (and in configure.in). Since we only used "Makefile" name in Tracker, I > prefer to rename concerned files now. > (see attached patch)
yes well spotted :) Thanks have now comitted so man pages should now be built and deployed -- Mr Jamie McCracken http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
