2007/8/14, Marcus Fritzsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 8/14/07, jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 16:30 +0200, Marcus Fritzsch wrote: > > > On 8/14/07, yelo_3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Don't you think that conversation results can be more user friendly? > > > > Instead of displaying the filename which is not exhaustive, a brief > > > > summary of the buddy name and the date is really better. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > I did this in the new deskbar patches (try searching for deskbar on > > > the recent ML posts ;)). > > > > > > Jamie, may I add some logfilename-parsing stuff to t-s-t (i.e. only > > > display different and marked up results)? basically it's one regex and > > > than some more low level parsing/splitting, it worked so far for all > > > logs I have here (jabber, irc and icq) and should do with others as > > > purple logs are pretty consistent. > > > > > > On the other hand, will conversation indexing be defined and supported > > > by XESAM? It would not make much sense implement that now and than > > > throw it away ;). > > > > > > well xesam wont be in time for gutsy so yes feel free (I dont know if xesam > > will cover this tbh) > > OK, than. Although I am no metadata evangelist I really look forward to XESAM > ;) >
Yes, conversation (chatlog, email, etc) metadata will be supported by the xesam spec. Cheers, Mikkel _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
