Le vendredi 08 août 2008 à 02:11 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 01:10 +0200, Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
> > Le jeudi 07 août 2008 à 22:06 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
> > > On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 19:40 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > > > Martyn Russell wrote:
> > > > > Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Phillip has a patch we can try for this. There are other means we use
> > > > in the indexer too which I will play with.
> > > 
> > > Laurent, can you try the patch that I have attached?
> > 
> > I applied it after I modified it a little bit:
> > 
> > In tracker-crawler.c around line 608, I have this line :
> >   g_list_foreach (files, (GFunc) g_object_unref, NULL);
> > 
> > You do not seem to have it in your patch so I removed it:
> 
> 
> Note that the patch is older than the current code. It sounds likely
> that the g_list_foreach is necessary unless you want a quite immense
> memory leak.
> 
> I'll let Martyn comment on this, though.

Ok.

> 
> > +   }
> > +   
> >       >>>>  No g_list_foreach(...) here?  <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> >     g_list_free (files);
> >  
> > -   /* Get next file */
> > +   /* Get next files */
> >     file_enumerate_next (enumerator, ed);
> >  }
> > 
> > > The more people test this kind of patches, the more sure we are of the
> > > performance impact.
> > 
> > This patch seems to give me better results  :-)
> 
> That's good!
> 
> > But while I'm writing this e-mail, I see Evolution getting frozen.
> > Perhaps a strange behavior of this software (as usual...).
> 
> Perhaps not, perhaps yes. We better make sure not ;-)

Indeed, I was a little bit too enthusiastic because Firefox is also
getting frozen from time to time but I can switch from an application to
another so it is still better.

I noticed that tracker-indexer has not an idle priority for I/O. The
program written in configure.ac does not correctly check whether I can
set I/O priorities on my system. IMHO it misuses the AC_LANG_PROGRAM
macro, and I do not understand why it uses exit() instead of return!? I
propose a patch (but, to be honest, I only fixed the use of M4 macros).
This fix works on my Fedora 9 x64. I can commit in trunk and
indexer-split branches if this patch is assumed to be correct.


And a question, why do I see this message often:

Tracker-Message: Items could not be processed by the indexer, Did not
receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not
send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the
reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.

All around it, I get this message:
Tracker-Message: Still waiting for response from indexer, not sending
more files yet
It appears 12 times, then I get the previous message! It's like a loop.


> > > Please remove all of tracker's caches before testing:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > svn co http://svn.gnome.org.svn/tracker/branches/indexer-split
> > > cd indexer-split
> > > 
> > > patch -p0 < crawler-more-than-one-file.diff
> > > 
> > > ./autogen.sh --pr... && make && sudo make install
> > > 
> > > 
> > > killall -9 tracker
> > > killall -9 tracker-indexer
> > > rm -rf $HOME/.cache/tracker
> > > rm -rf $HOME/.local/share/tracker
> > > rm -rf /tmp/*tracker*
> > > 
> > > trackerd -v 3
> > 
> > I saw something strange after I removed the caches: trackerd only found
> > a few directories in my home. I removed caches twice and I ran trackerd
> > each time with the following command:
> > 
> >    trackerd -s 0 -v 3
> > Then, I decided to run trackerd with this command:
> >    trackerd -v 3
> > and trackerd acted correctly by indexing the content of my home. Now it
> > seems I can run trackerd with, and without, "-s 0" without any problem!
> 
> 
> No idea, tbh
> 
> 
> Thanks for testing!
> 
> 
Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
--- configure.ac	(revision 2032)
+++ configure.ac	(working copy)
@@ -668,21 +668,27 @@
 # Check ioprio support
 ####################################################################
 
-AC_MSG_CHECKING([[checking ioprio support]])
+AC_MSG_CHECKING([[ioprio support]])
 have_ioprio=no
-AC_RUN_IFELSE([ AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
+AC_RUN_IFELSE([ AC_LANG_PROGRAM(
+   [[
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <errno.h> 
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
+   ]],
+   [[
 inline int ioprio_get (int which, int who)
 {
 	return syscall (__NR_ioprio_get, which, who);
 }
-   ]], [[
-exit(ioprio_get(1,0));
-   ]]) ], 
-   [ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_IOPRIO,[],[Define ioprio support]) have_ioprio=yes ])
+int main ()
+{
+        return ioprio_get (1, 0);
+}
+   ]]) ],
+   [ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_IOPRIO,[],[Define ioprio support]) have_ioprio=yes ],
+   [])
 AC_MSG_RESULT([$have_ioprio])
 
 ##################################################################

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

_______________________________________________
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list

Reply via email to