On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 08:52 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: > On 13/08/09 08:30, Ivan Frade wrote: > > Sorry, i pressed "Reply" instead of "Reply all" > > :) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Ivan Frade<ivan.fr...@gmail.com> > > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:27:03 +0300 > > Subject: Re: [Tracker] GNOME module proposal? > > To: Martyn Russell<mar...@lanedo.com> > > > > an enthusiastic +1 for the gnome module proposal. 6 months release is > > a good baseline (we should release more often, anyway). > > I agree. >
me 2 although we need a few weeks to do a release then propose > > practicalities: > > > > * should we propose everything or only the store? i would propose > > everything (store + miner-fs) and wait for the feedback. > > Everything. yes > > Remember, ISVs will disable what they want anyway. We can even disable > things by default ourselves. But I don't think tracker-store on its own > makes sense at all. It is heavily dependent on applications then and we > need something (in the mean time at least) to show off what you can do > based on the content we find for users. > > > * the store is gpl, but under a dbus API, could the license be a problem? > > I don't think this is a problem. Someone correct me if I am wrong, but > we should be ok. > its not a problem so long as libtracker is lgpl (dbus access is x license) jamie _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
