On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Martyn Russell <mar...@lanedo.com> wrote:

> On 05/10/09 10:16, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
>> Looks like nobody is yet making decisions regarding website. U guys
>> planning to expose 0.7 bits after 0.8 is released, since 0.7 is dev
>> series and 0.6 is prod series?
>>
>
> OK. So if there are no more comments by tomorrow lunch time, I will be
> pushing this site to go live.
>
> I forgot to add before, but I have also added the architecture png files
> created from dia about tracker-store and tracker-miner-fs if anyone is
> interested out the libraries and internals of those processes work (on a
> basic level). You can see those under the architecture heading here:
>
>  
> http://www.lanedo.com/~martyn/tracker-site/documentation.html<http://www.lanedo.com/%7Emartyn/tracker-site/documentation.html>
>
> The background is also not so black after comments from Michael Biebl. So
> thanks everyone for your comments. I think it looks good now!
>
>
It's a real step forward and I think it should be merged in master.

Two suggestions:
1. The text in the header png maybe can be white
2. The use of Nautilus or Totem is still to criptic. What actions are
required from the user to start using it? There are any?
I remember ubuntu disabled the support for tracker in the official nautilus.
Dunno if it is still the case.

Some random thoughts about the projects supporting tracker. Are still
supporting it or not?
http://projects.gnome.org/tracker/documentation.html#applications

Do we have to discriminate between the 0.6.9x series and the 0.7 from the
third pary support?

Cheers,
Michele
_______________________________________________
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list

Reply via email to