Hey Jussi, For these particular patches it doesn't matter that much. We can of course handle them. It's just that for future patches we prefer the format-patch format.
As you point out are these lacking the comment-body (and every commit needs a comment body for us). Cheers, thanks for the patches. We'll look into them and merge them to master soon. Philip On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:47 +0200, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > On 01/26/2011 01:12 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > > > Hey Jussi, > > > > Can you use git format-patch for your patches next time? This gives us a > > patch that keeps among other things the message, date and author of the > > commit. > > I can do that if you wish but I don't think there's any info missing: I > used git send-email and that should contain all the info needed (the > comment body is missing because I didn't think the commits needed any). > I just tested using "git am" on my original email and it seems to do the > right thing. > > But it's your call (and I can use the bugzilla as well if that's the > preferred way to get patches). > > - Jussi > -- Philip Van Hoof freelance software developer Codeminded BVBA - http://codeminded.be _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
