On 15/07/13 08:08, Jonatan Pålsson wrote:
On 12 July 2013 18:52, Ivan Frade <ivan.fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
If you are not using email, that ontology will be translated into some
tables in the database but they are never touched. It should not make big
difference.
Aha, this is very good to know. It should mean I can keep several
flattened ontologies side-by-side them impacting each other
negatively. This is good!
Generally speaking, you want to aim for the least changes as possible to
achieve what you want. That way you keep closer to upstream and have
less maintenance burden.
What's not clear to me is your targets or if you're looking for
optimisations out of curiosity.
What do you want to improve, query or insert times? Disk or memory
usage, etc. etc. The list goes on. It's all possible, but you sacrifice
something else when you do this.
--
Regards,
Martyn
Founder and CEO of Lanedo GmbH.
_______________________________________________
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
