Chris Withers <[email protected]> writes: >> This sounds a little bit complex, but it isn't, because you can use >> minibuffer's history for all the file names. > > It's *way* more complicated than the old /multi method, can that not > be brought back? Why was it removed in the first place?
Look at the syntax. It's horrible to parse, expecially when you want to complete (like in ido-mode). Do you know exactly whether a substring is meant as method, user name or host name? I don't. One proposal was to require always a method name in case of multihops. I don't know whether this will make things better. >> Maybe I shall add support in Tramp for this ad-hoc configuration. At >> least it shall be documented. > > Yes please, but proper ad-hoc, allowing specification of the transit > user, remote host and remote user all in one path. If there's anything > I can do to make that happen more quickly, please let me know... I have no real idea how to achieve this, sorry. If you come with a working solution you're welcome! Why not to go the other direction, and make ido aware of proxy hosts? >>> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/tramp/ChangeLog?root=tramp&view=markup >>> the correct change log to be looking at? I hope not, since it doesn't >>> mention either proxies arriving or multi: going away... >> >> For the Lisp code, you shall use >> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/tramp/lisp/ChangeLog?root=tramp&view=markup > > Okay, what's the other ChangeLog? There are 3 ChangeLogs. "viewvc/tramp/ChangeLog" is for overall makefiles and configuration scripts. "viewvc/tramp/lisp/ChangeLog" is for the real Lisp code. And "viewvc/tramp/texi/ChangeLog" is for the documentation. > cheers, > > Chris Best regards, Michael. _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
