Thanks Michael.  Looks like I should have gone to the Tramp manual, but I
was confused.  It truly was working before.  It is tied into my dirtrack
and elsewhere so there is no way I could have confused that.  I also modify
the prompt when entering projects by adding the project name.  I developed
a lot of code using remote access through Tramp.  I also set an inside
emacs environment variable in scripts.  RTFM time ... why every time I ask
a question ...

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:42 PM Michael Albinus <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thomas Walker Lynch <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> >>> Recently my prompt has changed on shells raised with Tramp.  I use
> >>> dirtrack, so this messes up Emacs royally.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the report. I need more data for analysis, though.
> >>
> >> - Which Emacs/Tramp version are you using? The Tramp version info is
> >> needed only in case you don't use the built-in Tramp.
> >
> > GNU Emacs 27.1 (build 1, x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version
> > 3.24.21, cairo version 1.16.0) of 2020-08-20
>
> Thanks. The other message you've confirmed, that you are using the
> builtin Tramp.
>
> > Here is what the erroneous prompt looks like:
> >
> >     /sudo:[email protected]:/root/ #$
>
> This is what Tramp sets, indeed. I have been irritated by saying
> "Recently my prompt has changed ...". This prompt is what Tramp does for
> years. I've just checked, also in Emacs 26.3 this happens. I don't know
> why this happens to you "recently" only.
>
> > This is what the prompt should look like:
> >
> >     2020-09-23T15:53:09Z root@localhost§/home/morpheus§
> >     #
>
> Well, the Tramp manual tells you about. See (info "(tramp) Remote shell
> setup")
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> Interactive shell prompt
>
>      TRAMP redefines the remote shell prompt internally for robust
>      parsing.  This redefinition affects the looks of a prompt in an
>      interactive remote shell through commands, such as ‘M-x shell
>      <RET>’.  Such prompts, however, can be reset to something more
>      readable and recognizable using these environment variables.
>
>      TRAMP sets the ‘INSIDE_EMACS’ environment variable in the startup
>      script file ‘~/.emacs_SHELLNAME’.
>
>      ‘SHELLNAME’ is ‘bash’ or equivalent shell names.  Change it by
>      setting the environment variable ‘ESHELL’ in the ‘.emacs’ as
>      follows:
>
>           (setenv "ESHELL" "bash")
>
>      Then re-set the prompt string in ‘~/.emacs_SHELLNAME’ as follows:
>
>           # Reset the prompt for remote TRAMP shells.
>           if [ "${INSIDE_EMACS/*tramp*/tramp}" == "tramp" ] ; then
>              PS1="[\u@\h \w]$ "
>           fi
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Honestly, I haven't tested these instructions for years. At least the
> sentence "TRAMP sets the ‘INSIDE_EMACS’ ..." is nonsense; this variable
> is changed somewhere else. But it sounds like a recipe you might go to
> get your prompt. I will be happy for a response, whether it works as
> documented for you (otherwise we need to adapt it).
>
> > After step 4 the prompt will appear erroneously as noted above when
> > emacs -Q was used.  Dirtrack will not be able to find it (and my
> > transcript records will be messed up due to not having the UTC time
> > stamps LOL)
> >
> > Note, this exact same thing happens when using tramp to open a remote
> > shell.  Here is the erroneous prompt I get on my server when opening a
> > remote shell:
> >
> >     /ssh:thomas_lynch@server:/home/thomas_lynch #$
>
> This is not erroneously, but the expected prompt from Tramp pov.
>
> > Thanks Michael et al.  I look forward to your reply, and apologize in
> > advance if I've done something stupid here.  Though gosh, it did work.
> >  I used it often, prompt was correct from the .bashrc and dirtrack
> > worked etc.
>
> This is what makes me wonder. What has changed in your config, that the
> prompt you're used to see has disappeared? Maybe there *are* other
> differences between Emacs 26.3 and 27.1 in this area, which I don't
> remember ...
>
> Anyway, what I have quoted above is the recommended way to fix
> it. There's no Tramp guarantee, that your .bashrc settings keep
> untouched.
>
> Best regards, Michael.
>

Reply via email to