Jim Porter <[email protected]> writes: Hi Jim,
> I noticed that I neglected to include this change for the "simplified" > and "separate" syntaxes (I'd forgotten they exist, since I just use > the default syntax). Attached is a patch for those. Last night, in bed, I had exactly the same idea :-) I've pushed this to the repositories. Both patches together exceed the small patch line limit a little bit, but I believe it is acceptable, because at least the comments repeat themselves. I shouldn't be a pedantic German :-) > - Jim Best regards, Michael.
