> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Gro�johann) writes: > > > No, you're lying :-) > > Whee. Please don't be offended. Of course, you didn't > _intentionally_ say something which is false! Just a mistake. > > Often people have said that they know exactly what is the right > setting for Tramp and they are miffed that Tramp insists on checking > itself. You were just a convenient example of a person who was so > sure to be right, yet wrong. Maybe I shouldn't make jokes at other > people's expenses :-| >
Don't worry, I didn't take offense. I was being pedantic just to make a point. I appreciate that Tramp insists on checking for itself. I was just saying it shouldn't fail because of all that checking. tlh _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
