Francis Litterio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, every Emacs session gets a cryptographically secure random value > for tramp-end-of-output. The liklihood of it appearing in the output of > a remote command is very small.
Note that I've selected "/////" because it can't appear in the output of the shell commands that Tramp normally uses, such as "ls -l". In this case, I'm _sure_ that the prompt won't occur. For your suggestion it's just _unlikely_ :-) This was also the main reason why I didn't incorporate Daniel's change. The second reason for not incorporating the change is that people might see strange behavior which cannot be reproduced. I don't like bugs that go away if you look at them. Therefore I wanted to have a fixed prompt so that people who complain about a misbehavior can at least reproduce the problem when I ask them. But I can see that the issue is different for tramp-handle-shell-command, where the string "/////" might indeed occur. Your (and Daniel's) suggestion could easily be extended to deal with the first problem I'm mentioning above, by including "///" in the prompt. But I don't know how to deal with the second issue. Ideas? kai -- ~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn (Frank Nobis) _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
