>Anyway, I use HEAD for my everyday usage (v4l recording (and records
>transcoding and a few other uncommon uses), and AFAIK Andrew (the other active
>developer) does the same.
That's using the word "active" very liberally ;) but yes, I also use
transcode CVS for all my transcoding. In any case, as Francesco says, it
works to the extent that (1) it compiles, and (2) if anything we personally
use breaks, it gets fixed quickly. For my part, I try to test anything I
make significant changes to, or disable it if I know it's not going to
work, but given the lack of a comprehensive testsuite for transcode (and
the difficulty of building one--changes in external codecs' implementations
can result in different output, even if it's "correct" in the sense that it
looks the same to a human).
--Andrew Church
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://achurch.org/
