Bob,

Thanks for taking the time to look, I appreciate it. I'm going to go
ahead with it now; that first thread just had me worried there might
have been something about transfer's caching behavior that I had
overlooked.

Thanks again,
Chris

On Mar 1, 8:16 pm, Bob Silverberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I just read through those threads and I don't think that either of
> them suggest that there would be an issue with the cache using the
> implementation of single table inheritance that I described.
>
> I did discuss the idea/implementation with Mark, and he didn't see any
> potential pitfalls.  He did point out, however, that a number of forms
> of inheritance, including single table inheritance, are on the roadmap
> for a future version of Transfer.  I imagine that whatever Mark ends
> up implementing will be far more flexible and elegant that what Paul
> and I came up with - if you are in a position to wait for it.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:46 AM, achebe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bob,
>
> > The specific post I'm referring to is here:
> >http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/msg/203ace509ed70f69
>
> > There is also another post by Mark that says you should _generally_
> > have only one TO per table:
> >http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/msg/f68a829a19fb4726
>
> > I've seen your blog post on STI and a couple of posts on the list
> > where other people where successfully using it and I can't see any
> > issues with it either.
>
> > Thanks,
> >   Chris
>
> > On Mar 1, 10:25 am, Bob Silverberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Just back from a week in Jamaica, hence the late reply ;-)
>
> >> I did an experiment in which I was able to implement a form of single
> >> table inheritance using Transfer, which I wrote about on my blog.  I
> >> did not foresee any problems with the cache, so I'm not sure to what
> >> you are referring.  Do you have any links to the posts that you read
> >> that suggest this can be a problem?
>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Bob
>
> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:34 PM, achebe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > I've seen a few posts on Single Table Inheritance where it's been
> >> > mentioned that it can be done but that it is difficult because of the
> >> > need to manage the transfer cache and I was hoping someone could shed
> >> > a little light on what specific issues there are to look out for?
>
> >> --
> >> Bob Silverbergwww.silverwareconsulting.com
>
> --
> Bob Silverbergwww.silverwareconsulting.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to