Perhaps I'm doing this totally wrong, but this is what I'm trying...
I have a bean called userService:
<bean id="userService" class="model.users.userService">
<constructor-arg name="transfer">
<ref bean="Transfer" />
</constructor-arg>
<constructor-arg name="transaction">
<ref bean="TransferTransaction" />
</constructor-arg>
<constructor-arg name="userGateway">
<ref bean="userGateway"/>
</constructor-arg>
</bean>
This is the TransferTransaction that I am passing to the constructor
on userService:
<bean id="TransferTransaction" factory-bean="ColdboxOCM" factory-
method="get">
<constructor-arg name="objectKey"><value>TransferTransaction</
value></constructor-arg>
</bean>
In the init method of userService I do:
<cffunction name="init" access="public" output="false"
returntype="userService">
<cfargument name="transfer" type="transfer.com.Transfer"
required="true" />
<cfargument name="transaction"
type="transfer.com.sql.transaction.Transaction" required="true" />
<cfargument name="userGateway" type="userGateway"
required="true" />
<cfset variables.transfer = arguments.transfer />
<cfset variables.userGateway = arguments.userGateway />
<cfset arguments.transaction.advise(this,"saveuser")>
<cfreturn this/>
</cffunction>
Now, as far as I'm aware, this should now wrap saveuser method on
userService in a transaction, so that if anything fails inside of a
call to userService's saveuser method then all database actions that
happened during the transaction (during the saveuser method) will be
rolled back.
In my handler I do:
userService = getPlugin("ioc").getBean("userService");
user = instance.Transfer.new("users.user");
user.setEmail("t...@test.com");
user.setPassword("test");
user.setAccountType(2);
userService.saveuser(user);
So, this works and the database entry is created.
However, if I go into my userService and add some bad code in the
saveuser method:
<cffunction name="saveuser" access="public" output="false"
returntype="void">
<cfargument name="user" type="any" required="true" />
<cfset variables.transfer.save(arguments.user) />
<cfset variables.transfer.save(arguments.FAKEOBJECT) />
</cffunction>
Since FAKEOBJECT doesn't exist, it throws an error. However, the save
right before it worked and stays in the database.
I was under the impression that this kind of transaction would roll
back the first save also when the FAKEOBJECT save failed since they
are both advised by this:
<cfset arguments.transaction.advise(this,"saveuser")>
I have also tried do this inside of my handler instead:
transaction = getPlugin("ioc").getBean("TransferTransaction");
userService = getPlugin("ioc").getBean("userService");
user = instance.Transfer.new("users.user");
user.setEmail("t...@test.com");
user.setPassword("test");
user.setAccountType(2);
args = structNew();
args.user = user;
transaction.execute(userService, "saveuser", args)
But I get the same results. When there is no bad code in the saveuser
method, it works fine and I see the insert in the database, but when I
add the FAKEOBJECT to produce an error like so:
<cfset variables.transfer.save(arguments.user) />
<cfset variables.transfer.save(arguments.FAKEOBJECT) />
The first save isn't rolled back, the new object stays in the
database.
Any ideas why a simple transaction isn't rolling back the database?
Thanks!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
