Thanks for the input guys and yeah I know what you're saying Mark. It's along the same lines as what I was saying about the decorator / original property thing :-). It's an unknown as to how it should be managed.
Looking into things a bit more tonight it seems that Railo supports dynamic method name calls. ACF doesn't - well CF8 anyway, I don't know if CF9 has impressed on that side of things. So in Railo I can do object[method](args); - if that's what you're referring to Quack (?) That would be fine to work, so I guess another argument would be that I'm trying to work around the restrictions CF8 is imposing on us rather than what the objects aren't giving me. Thanks again - appreciate your time. James -- Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer Try out the new Transfer ORM Custom Google Search: http://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=002375903941309441958:2s7wbd5ocb8 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to transfer-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
