Roger I agree with the guidlines outlined by Graham Dulmage.
Best regards Chris Penney www.cjpen.co.uk >Dear Roger, > >JATE rules would say as follows: > >1) There are 2 approved items >2) One connects in front of the other > >If the 2 items are >a) still identified and sold under their respective model numbers >and brand names and approval >and are >b) in no way altered in function, software and hardware >and are >c) approved such that the device behind the product it is connected >is approved for connection to any port or interface of the type that >is on the non-network side of the adaptor unit >and >d) that the connection to the PBX from the adapter was investigated >and approved for the type of interface it is now connecting to or >such interface was listed and checked >and the >e) combination is not marketed as a new product >and >f) the adaptor sits outside(that is not added into the chassis or >cabinet of the PBX system in any way) of the product it is connecting >to > > >than the 2 devices can be interconnected and used as such in the >network. > > >Over the last 2 years JATE rules have been changing and some conventions >have been modified. > >I hope this helps. > >Regards > >G. Rae Dulmage, B. Comm., >(613)-257-7752 or 3015 > >Tosto, Roger wrote: >> >> Hello treggers, >> Can someone advise what the Jate (Japan) rules are for the following: >> >> 1. Can an ancilliary device be approved for connection to other >> approved equipment? >> >> 2. If so, can an approved ancilliary device be interconnected to a >> Jate approved PBX and the combination attached to the network, or does >> Jate require approval of the combined configuration, >> for example, >> attaching an approved line interface protocol converter to an >> approved PBX and the combination attached to the CO network w/o >> further assessment. >> >> Thanks >> >> Roger Tosto >> IPC Information Systems > >
