WELCOME TO IWPR’S TRIBUNAL UPDATE No. 530, December 14, 2007

DEL PONTE SLAMS SERBIA IN LAST REPORT TO UN  Chief prosecutor pulls no punches 
in her assessment of Belgrade’s cooperation with the tribunal.  By Oliver 
Bullough in London

CHIEF PROSECUTOR PLEADS FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION  Del Ponte tells her 
farewell press conference that prosecutors cannot function without 
international support.  By Simon Jennings in The Hague

COURTSIDE:

SARAJEVO SIEGE GENERAL GETS 33 YEARS  Bosnian Serb general whose troops 
besieged the city receives one of the toughest sentences issued by the 
tribunal.  By Merdijana Sadovic in Sarajevo

CROATIAN COURT HEARS OF CHILLING ORDER  Protected witness said she heard 
soldiers say they had been ordered to kill all the inhabitants of her village.  
By Goran Jungvirth in Zagreb

**** IWPR RESOURCES 
******************************************************************

NEW PUBLICATION: SYRIA PRESS MONITOR. Weekly round-up of news and opinion from 
the Syrian national and diaspora press. To find out more or subscribe to RSS 
feed please go to: http://iwpr.net/syriapressmonitor.html 

SAHAR JOURNALISTS’ ASSISTANCE FUND: IWPR is establishing a fund, in honour of 
Sahar al-Haideri, to support journalist participants in its training and 
reporting programmes around the world.  The Sahar Journalists’ Assistance Fund 
will be used to support local journalists in cases of exile or disability, or 
to assist their families in case of death in service. To find out more or 
donate please go to:
http://www.iwpr.net/sahar.html 

COALITION FOR INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE (CIJ) TRIAL REPORTS ARCHIVE: When CIJ 
closed in 2006, it donated its searchable Trial Reports Archive to IWPR in 
recognition of our own reporting work and to ensure these courtroom reports 
would remain available to the public. Milosevic and other ICTY Trial Reports as 
well as Sierra Leone Reports are now available at 
<http://iwpr.net/?apc_state=hen&s=c> 

NOW AVAILABLE IN FRENCH: Reporting Justice: A Handbook on Covering War Crimes 
Courts. Part I: http://iwpr.net/pdf/reporting_justice_p1_w_fr.pdf; Part II: 
http://iwpr.net/pdf/reporting_justice_p2_w_fr.pdf

INTRODUCTION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Available at 
http://iwpr.net/?apc_state=henotri&s=o&o=tribunal_icc_00.html 

**** www.iwpr.net 
********************************************************************

TRIBUNAL UPDATE RSS: http://www.iwpr.net/en/tri/rss.xml 

RECEIVE FROM IWPR: Readers are urged to subscribe to IWPR's full range of free 
electronic publications at: 
http://www.iwpr.net/index.php?apc_state=henh&s=s&m=p 

GIVE TO IWPR: IWPR is wholly dependent upon grants and donations. For more 
information about how you can support IWPR go to: 
http://www.iwpr.net/donate.html 

**** www.iwpr.net 
********************************************************************

DEL PONTE SLAMS SERBIA IN LAST REPORT TO UN

Chief prosecutor pulls no punches in her assessment of Belgrade’s cooperation 
with the tribunal. 

By Oliver Bullough in London

Carla Del Ponte accused Serbian officials of “willful obstruction” and told 
world powers they lacked the will to arrest fugitives from justice, in her last 
statement as chief prosecutor of the Hague tribunal.

Del Ponte has repeatedly thought the captures of Bosnian Serb wartime leaders 
Ratko Mladic and Radavan Karadzic were imminent, but leaves office after eight 
years with them still at large.

“Despite the Serbian authorities' declared commitment to fully cooperate with 
my office and improved procedures, there is no clear roadmap, no clear plan in 
the search for fugitives, no serious leads and no sign that serious efforts 
have been taken to arrest the fugitives,” she said in her last report to the 
United Nations Security Council on December 10.

“This is a job that requires the full commitment of the State and of all of its 
relevant institutions. Unfortunately, we have seen that level of commitment 
only in words, not in deeds… In short, there is no full cooperation with my 
office.”

She said Serbian security organs failed to cooperate with the Hague tribunal, 
or with each other, and she even accused officials of “willful obstruction”.

Full cooperation would be shown only with the arrest and transfer of Mladic, 
who is accused of orchestrating the genocide of Bosniaks in Srebrenica in 1995.

“I urge the international community to seriously address this issue. I ask in 
particular the European Union Member States and the European Union's Commission 
to maintain their principled position by insisting on Serbia's full cooperation 
with the International Tribunal as a condition in the EU pre-accession and 
accession process,” she said.

The tribunal’s president, Judge Fausto Pocar, also addressed the UN Security 
Council this week and pleaded with it to let the court remain open until all 
fugitives are caught and tried.

The Hague tribunal is due to shut down by 2010, even if four high-profile 
suspects remain at large.

“The tribunal should not close its doors before these fugitives are arrested 
and tried. I urge the Security Council to make it clear that the trial of these 
fugitives by the international community does not hinge upon the tribunal's 
proposed completion strategy dates,” President  Pocar said in his December 10 
speech.

He said the tribunal had improved efficiency and sped up its own operations, 
while helping courts in Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia conduct cases. Courts in the 
three countries were now trying 13 suspects handed over by the tribunal, but 
were still under-resourced.

“There is a desperate need to ensure adequate detention facilities for remand 
and convicted accused. Much also remains to be achieved in the training of 
police and prison officers on due process and human rights standards,” he said.

He asked council states to assure money was made available to the tribunal to 
pay full pensions to its staff, some of whom where having to leave to get 
pensions in their home countries.  If the tribunal failed to retain its judges, 
then it would struggle to get its work done on schedule, he said.

Oliver Bullough is an IWPR editor.


CHIEF PROSECUTOR PLEADS FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

Del Ponte tells her farewell press conference that prosecutors cannot function 
without international support.

By Simon Jennings in The Hague

Carla Del Ponte, pleased but frustrated after eight years as chief prosecutor 
for war crimes in The Hague, said this week that international cooperation is 
key to catching the last fugitives from justice.

“International prosecutors cannot function without the support of states, 
without political support. We depend on their good will,” Del Ponte told 
reporters at her final press conference before she stands down at the end of 
the month.

Despite having taken 91 war crimes suspects into custody during her tenure, 
former Bosnian Serb leaders Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic have eluded her 
grasp. Both men are charged with genocide in Srebrenica, where 8,000 Bosniak 
civilians were killed by Serb forces in July 1995.

“The fact that Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic are still at large is a stain 
on our work,” said Del Ponte. 

The tribunal has achieved some important landmarks since she took up her post 
in September 1999. The court recognised the massacre at Srebrenica as genocide, 
and ruled that the siege of Sarajevo was a war crime. 

But Del Ponte feels she lacked the full support of the international community 
in bringing individuals to justice.  And without such support she feels 
Karadzic and Mladic will never face trial for their crimes. 

“It is extremely important that the European Union put political pressure on 
Belgrade to arrest [them],” she said.

Brussels has linked potential Serbian membership of the EU to Belgrade’s 
continuing cooperation with the war crimes court: a policy it calls 
“conditionality”.

“I hope that the European Union will continue to support this institution and 
maintain its conditionality until that happens. The tribunal must not close its 
doors before all remaining fugitives are brought to justice.”

However, Del Ponte confirmed that her office was making preparations with war 
crimes prosecutors in Croatia, Serbia, and Bosnia for their judiciaries to be 
able to conduct trials of war crimes suspects.

“The most important result of all of this is that no one who has committed 
crimes should sleep peacefully,” she said.

Del Ponte said there were other lessons that could also be learnt from her time 
in The Hague. She advocated that the cross examination of victims be abolished 
on compassionate grounds and that the process of presenting evidence be speeded 
up by initially presenting it in written or visual form. 

The departing prosecutor concluded by paying tribute to the victims of the 
crimes heard at the tribunal. 

“When we met with them we got the necessary energy and power to continue this 
work,” she said. 

Simon Jennings is an IWPR reporter in The Hague.


COURTSIDE:

SARAJEVO SIEGE GENERAL GETS 33 YEARS

Bosnian Serb general whose troops besieged the city receives one of the 
toughest sentences issued by the tribunal.

By Merdijana Sadovic in Sarajevo

The Hague tribunal this week handed down one of its toughest sentences so far, 
ruling that a former Bosnian Serb army general should serve 33 years in jail 
for his role in the last 15 months of the 1992-1995 siege of Sarajevo. 

Dragan Milosevic was found guilty of crimes against humanity and of a violation 
of the laws or customs of war. He was convicted on five counts of terror, 
murder and inhumane acts conducted during a campaign of sniping and shelling 
which resulted in the injury and death of a great number of civilians in the 
besieged Bosnian capital. 

Two counts of unlawful attacks against civilians were dismissed.

At the time relevant to the indictment, Milosevic was a commander of the 
Sarajevo-Romanija Corps, SRK, of the Bosnian Serb army which besieged Sarajevo 
over a 15-month period, up to the end of the conflict in November 1995.  

Milosevic, 65, took up this post in August 1994. His predecessor, former 
Bosnian Serb army general Stanslav Galic, is currently serving life 
imprisonment for his role in the 1992-95 siege of the Bosnian capital.

More than 10,000 people were killed in the Bosniak-held part of Sarajevo in 
fighting and sniper attacks during the siege. Thousands more lived in 
unbearable conditions, without any electricity, and with scarce food and water 
supplies. Some witnesses compared the siege of Sarajevo to the siege of 
Leningrad during World War Two.

"The evidence discloses a horrific tale of the encirclement and entrapment of a 
city," said Judge Patrick Robinson in the summary of the judgment read out on 
December 11. 

"There was no safe place in Sarajevo, one could be killed or injured anywhere 
and anytime."

The trial chamber also found that it was under Miloševic’s command of the SRK 
that modified air bombs were deployed, noting that these were “inaccurate and 
served no military purpose”.

“Each time a modified air bomb was launched [Milosevic] was playing with the 
lives of the civilians in Sarajevo,” concluded the judges. 

According to the trial chamber, the effects of those air bombs were 
“overwhelming, in terms of injuries, deaths, destruction and the psychological 
impact on the civilian population”.

Reading the judgment, Judge Robinson said that  ”while the evidence shows that 
there were lulls in fighting between the armies and in the shelling of the 
city, it also shows that there was always a constant level of sniping”.

As one of the most horrendous incidents that took place during the time when 
Milosevic commanded the SRK, the judges highlighted the Markale Market massacre 
of August 28, 1995, which killed 34 civilians and wounded 78. 

In the summary of the judgment, they said that one of the police officers who 
investigated the incident described what he saw as "the last, deepest circle of 
Dante's hell".

The trial chamber found that the market was shelled by the SRK, rejecting the 
defence’s argument that the massacre was staged by the Bosnian army, in order 
to attract the international attention and provoke NATO bombing of Serb 
positions around Sarajevo.

As commander of the SRK, Miloševic “held a tight chain of command ensuring that 
he was …kept abreast of the activities of his units”, said the judges.  They 
pointed out one particular order issued by Miloševic on April 6, 1995 in which 
he instructed one of the brigades under his command to “immediately prepare a 
launcher with an aerial bomb and transport the bomb for launching… The most 
profitable target must be selected in [Sarajevo suburbs], where the greatest 
casualties and material damage would be inflicted”.

The trial chamber said that Miloševic “made regular use of a highly inaccurate 
weapon with great explosive power: the modified air bomb”.

The court said “it is clear from the evidence that the SRK knew well that these 
weapons were indiscriminate and inaccurate”, and that they could only be 
directed at a general area, making it impossible to predict where they would 
strike.

The president of the Federal Commission on Missing Persons Amor Masovic says 
this judgment is important because it finally puts an end on Serb allegations 
that the 1995 Markale massacre was staged by the Bosnian army.

Merdijana Sadovic is IWPR’s Hague tribunal programme manager.


CROATIAN COURT HEARS OF CHILLING ORDER

Protected witness said she heard soldiers say they had been ordered to kill all 
the inhabitants of her village.

By Goran Jungvirth in Zagreb

A woman told a war crimes trial in Zagreb this week how she overheard Croat 
soldiers, who were rampaging through her village, say “not even a cat should 
remain alive”.

Giving testimony at the trial of two Croat generals, Rahim Ademi and Mirko 
Norac, witness number 19, whose identity is kept secret for her own protection, 
said her 74-year-old aunt, who was deaf and blind, was murdered by the 
soldiers. She herself said she hid in some bushes.

“Shoot, you know that [Janko] Bobetko (the then head of the Croatian army 
command) and Ademi ordered that not even a cat should remain alive,” one 
soldier told another, according to her testimony.

Ademi and Norac are accused of having responsibility for the troops who pushed 
through the “Medak Pocket”, a small salient of Serb-held territory in Croatia, 
in 1993.

It is alleged that Ademi, who was acting commander of the Gospic Military 
District, played a central role in planning, ordering and executing the 
operation on September 9-17, 1993.

Norac was commander of the 9th Guards Motorised Brigade - the main unit 
involved – and held the rank of colonel. 

According to the indictment, at least 29 local Serb civilians were killed and 
dozens seriously injured during this operation. The indictment also alleges 
that Croatian forces killed at least five Serb soldiers who had been captured 
or wounded. 

Witness number 19 said the murder of her aunt had been ordered by a soldier 
called Dragan, one of around ten soldiers who attacked the village in green 
uniforms and helmets.

The presiding judge Marin Mrcela warned her that she had not implicated Ademi 
when talking to war crimes investigators in 1999, only Bobetko. 

“The devil knows, perhaps I did not. It was enough for me that Bobetko made 
that order. They were by the way in Gospic and were only ordering poor people 
to kill and plunder,” she said.

She said the looting and arson began only after the Croatian soldiers were 
ordered to retreat, under pressure from the United Nations peacekeeping troops 
UNPROFOR. She said UNPROFOR had called her in to identify the bodies of two 
killed Serb neighbours, Andja and Miro Jovic.

Norac’s defence objected to her testimony, calling it “superficial and 
contradictory”.

She was followed by the testimony of Witness number 18, who is also from the 
village of Citluk, and who said not one shot was fired from the village at the 
Croatian soldiers. This was in contradiction to the defence team, which says 
Citluk was a launchpad for attacks on Gospic and other regional centres.

The witness said no one who surrendered to the Croatians remained alive.

The next day, on December 11, the court saw photographs showing 
partially-burned bodies in basements and some mutilated and disintegrated 
bodies. 

The photographs were taken by UNPROFOR after the action and show people in both 
civilian and military clothing among the dead. The photographs also showed 
destroyed and burned houses.

“Croatian forces systematically destroyed built objects during their delayed 
retreat. Houses were still burning when UNPROFOR entered for the first time in 
some areas; some corpses were still burning….the Croatian Army conducted a 
full-scale scorched earth policy,” according to the UNPROFOR report prepared at 
the time, as read out by Judge Marin Mrcela.

Norac’s defence objected to UNPROFOR’s report “because it didn’t match the real 
situation”.

The rest of the week featured defence witnesses, who related that the Croatian 
military followed the international conventions of war laid out in the Geneva 
conventions.

Miodrag Hecimovic, former commander of the 3rd battalion of Norac’s brigade, 
said that he had only heard about the crimes in the Medak Pocket from the 
media. He described Ademi and Norac as two men who punished anyone who did 
something wrong.

Hecimovic denied the existence of “Sector one” which, according to the 
indictment, was commanded by Norac. However, he confirmed that Norac had an 
isolated command centre in Bilaj where commanders briefed him after the 
operation and confirmed that everything was okay on the ground.

The trial continues next week.


WITNESS CLAIMS SESELJ WHIPPED UP “XENOPHOBIC NATIONALISM”

Sociology professor says Serbian hardliner glorified Serb nation and exploited 
victimhood to “morally justify collective violence”.

By Simon Jennings in The Hague

A witness at the war crimes trial of a Serbian ultra-nationalist leader 
described this week how Vojislav Seselj deliberately whipped up Serbs’ fears to 
create “xenophobic nationalism”.

Seselj made hundreds of speeches, broadcasts and appearances during the early 
1990s, and witness Anthony Oberschall analysed more than 400 transcripts to 
build up a picture of his approach.

“The solutions he proposes admit of no compromise,” said Oberschall, a 
professor of sociology at the University of Carolina.

Seselj is charged by the Hague tribunal for war crimes and crimes against 
humanity including persecution, extermination, murder and torture carried out 
in Croatia, Bosnia and northern Serbia between 1991 and 1993. 

He is charged with conspiring with late Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic to 
effect the “permanent forcible removal…of a majority of the Croat, Muslim and 
other non-Serb populations” and with participating in a war of hatred against 
non-Serb people.

In proceedings punctuated by incessant objections from the accused, who is the 
president of the Serbian Radical Party, SRS, and is representing himself, 
Oberschall explained how Seselj used political discourse to spread nationalist 
propaganda without regard for truth or accuracy. 

The witness said Seselj exploited victimhood and glorified the Serb nation to 
“morally justify collective violence”. According to Oberschall, Seselj depicted 
Serbs as victims of crimes committed in the past by national minorities which 
again posed a threat that needed to be eliminated. 

As revealed in video clips of the SRS leader played by the prosecution, Seselj 
said the then-Croatian president Franjo Tudman posed a threat against the Serb 
population and suggested there could be a repeat of mass murders of Serbs which 
took place during the Second World War.

“The most important stimulus is a threat stimulus. This will raise the fear of 
the audience. People will then back action to remove the threat,” said 
Oberschall.

To demonstrate the impact of Seselj’s political rhetoric the prosecution played 
a video tape of an SRS volunteer boarding a bus in Belgrade to go to the 
frontline. 

“When I watch TV and see what’s going on I want to help and it’s worth 
sacrificing my life,” said the volunteer.

During cross examination, Seselj sought to undermine Oberschall’s credentials 
as an expert witness. He first tried to show that his knowledge of 
physics, which he studied before turning to sociology, was limited, by asking 
him factual questions about the subject. 

He then claimed the witness’s report was incomplete because he had not read 
some of Seselj’s books, which he said proved that the “popes of Rome are the 
main criminals and culprits for the war in former Yugoslavia”.

Oberschall said he did not read such “science fiction” and that the texts were 
not relevant to his expert analysis. Seselj responded, in one of several 
speeches rather than by conventional questioning, that the witness was 
“burdened with stereotypes” and that they were “worlds apart”.

Simon Jennings is an IWPR reporter in The Hague.

**** www.iwpr.net 
********************************************************************

TRIBUNAL UPDATE, the publication arm of IWPR's International Justice Project, 
produced since 1996, details the events and issues at the International 
Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, ICTY, at The Hague.

These weekly reports, produced by IWPR's human rights and media training 
project, seek to contribute to regional and international understanding of the 
war crimes prosecution process.

The opinions expressed in Tribunal Update are those of the authors and do not 
necessarily represent those of the publication or of IWPR.

Tribunal Update is supported by the European Commission, the Dutch Ministry for 
Development and Cooperation, the Swedish International Development and 
Cooperation Agency, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and other funders. 
IWPR also acknowledges general support from the Ford Foundation.

TRIBUNAL UPDATE: Editor-in-Chief: Anthony Borden; Managing Editor: Yigal 
Chazan; Senior Editor: John MacLeod; International Justice Senior Editor: 
Merdijana Sadovic; Translation: Predrag Brebanovic, and others; Project 
Director: Duncan Furey.

IWPR Project Development and Support: Executive Director: Anthony Borden; 
Strategy & Assessment Director: Alan Davis; Chief Programme Officer: Mike Day.

**** www.iwpr.net 
********************************************************************

IWPR builds democracy at the frontlines of conflict and change through the 
power of professional journalism. IWPR programs provide intensive hands-on 
training, extensive reporting and publishing, and ambitious initiatives to 
build the capacity of local media. Supporting peace-building, development and 
the rule of law, IWPR gives responsible local media a voice.

Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030  Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

For further details on this project and other information services and media 
programmes, go to: www.iwpr.net 

ISSN 1477-7940 Copyright © 2007 The Institute for War & Peace Reporting 

**** www.iwpr.net 
********************************************************************

If you wish to change your subscription details or unsubscribe please go to:  
http://www.iwpr.net/index.php?apc_state=henh&s=s&m=p 


Reply via email to